Search Tags:

Categories:

Hidden / Caché Trailer - Juliette Binoche 2005



Uploaded by: heroxmasox
Video Description:
Trailer for the hit French film starring Juliette Binoche and Daniel Auteuil and directed by Michael Haneke


Tags for this video: auteuil binoche cache haneke hidden juliette trailer

Find more videos in the "Entertainment" category
See more videos uploaded by heroxmasox

Related Videos
Damage trailer - Juliette Binoche 1992Blue Trailer - Juliette Binoche 1993La Pianiste - Parte 1
damage-trailer-juliette-binoche-1992.htmldamage-trailer-juliette-binoche-1992.htmldamage-trailer-juliette-binoche-1992.html
Code Unknown - OpeningLancôme Poême advert - Juliette Binoche - 1998Frost over the world - Juliette Binoche - 26 Sep 08
damage-trailer-juliette-binoche-1992.htmldamage-trailer-juliette-binoche-1992.htmldamage-trailer-juliette-binoche-1992.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
Piss on you. It was ... ( 6 months ago by MadShangi)
Piss on you. It was a brilliant film. And P.S. it was that guy's son that was sending the tapes. He's seen talking with the other guy's son in the very last shot. Both boys may even be responsible. Or one is toying with the other.
Doesn't even matter. ( 6 months ago by faraz1729)
Doesn't even matter.
Leave it to an ... ( 6 months ago by faraz1729)
Leave it to an idiot like you to watch every film for cliché things like plot development and ending.
Why buy a car that ... ( 6 months ago by superdleg)
Why buy a car that has an engine. Why try to determine a rocket ship's trajectory using calculus, who needs it! lol. faraz1729 must be a woman due to the use of logic. If a movie has no plot then there is no movie.
What a horrendous ... ( 6 months ago by faraz1729)
What a horrendous analogy. Cars and rocket ships are practical objects that are bound by physical laws as to whether they'll function or not. Art is not. Art is a human endeavor that has the ability to come the closest to absolute freedom. So your argument is flawed from the start. Who is this art-fascist dictator who told you a movie must have a plot, anyway?
Oh, and I'm a man so you're wrong about that too. Thanks for playing though.
If you're a man ... ( 6 months ago by superdleg)
If you're a man that is sad. So you're telling me a rocket ship or a car is not a form of art? So I guess their designed themselves. Neither is boundless and both have their limitations meaning whatever the mind can come up with. What we thought was science fiction in the past has become science fact today. At least a car or a rocket ship is useful forms of art.
It's these ... ( 6 months ago by superdleg)
It's these exceptions to the rules that have paved the way for people like Andres Serrano and his Piss Christ calling it art. Fascist, ha! Freedom is doing what is right not whatever the hell you want. Get a clue.
Give one reason why ... ( 6 months ago by faraz1729)
Give one reason why the Piss Christ is not art. Good luck, art-fascist.
Cars and rockets ... ( 6 months ago by faraz1729)
Cars and rockets are not art, you idiot. Go look up the definition of art and try again.
And who said they're designed themselves? Your reading comprehension sucks.
Idiot. Your liberal ... ( 6 months ago by superdleg)
Idiot. Your liberal until you grow up, dumb kid. Also, look up the meaning of fascist. I'm done with you.
I am studying this ... ( 5 months ago by drawfourwild)
I am studying this now in one of my classes. I don't think that Haneke created this and intended that the audience know who sent the tapes at the end. But it's an art film so it's open to interpretation. However you interpret this it's obvious that it's a brilliant film. The end shot is symbolic so it's not definite that it was Pierrot. When viewing the commentary Haneke had said it was about guilt.
This movie looks ... ( 4 months ago by kondurperufour)
This movie looks great, I will watch it, is like a psycological thriller,right??? but I heard is kind of weird
the film it's ... ( 1 month ago by linduzzz)
the film it's beautiful.. it's like a magian..
As a student of ... ( 1 month ago by Jawooosh)
As a student of communications and media studies I didn't see any art in this film at all. The only creative aspect in this movie was the begining when suddenly the tape rewinds and we didn't know they were watching a tape. Im really getting sick and tired of these people making effortless crap and and people calling it art. How bout I just go video tape a rock for 2 hours and watch "artistic" people call it beautiful because they can think up 1000 diffrent metaphores for a rock. Its bullshit.
I agree. Michael ... ( 1 month ago by lelandb123)
I agree. Michael Haneke's films in general really tend to toy with what we think of what a horror film or a thriller should be. There's so many times when you think something might happen but it doesn't. It's also like with the tapes. The film isn't about who sent the tapes or why it's how the people react.
The movie really ... ( 1 month ago by lelandb123)
The movie really isn't about who sent the tapes.
Array ( 1 month ago by paulgroeser)
@Jawoosh
Maybe to appreciate the movie more, you should become more familiar with France's (or Europe's) past with colonialism and immigration and the impact on present-day society; the theme 'guilt' (which is indissoluble connected to colonialism and immigration/segegration) is presented metaphorically here in the thriller-setting of one man's family history. A wealthy, white guy who really don't want to think about his own past. The same holds true for European societies.
European society ... ( 1 month ago by Jawooosh)
European society and its presents on guilt is a reason why I should appreciate this movie more because they present "guilt" in a metaphorical way as paying tribute to France's Colonial and Immigration History?
Array ( 1 month ago by 03jblunt)
@ Jawoosh.
You are very naive to believe this. Please watch the film again. Haneke, the director, is one of the modern greats. The film offers everything and confirms nothing. It leaves the audience thinking about what they have just seen, leaving the audience to make their own decisions. Please don't write back an angry comment, I just want you to give the film another chance as this is one of the greatest films of the decade. Thank you
"Student of Media ... ( 3 weeks ago by ilyushenko)
"Student of Media And Communication Studies". Says it all really. I guess I'll be ordering my Big Mac and Fries from you then. If you don't "get" Haneke......Maybe you should go and study something else.
Congrats on " ... ( 3 weeks ago by Jawooosh)
Congrats on "getting" this boaring talentless piece of shit just like all the rest of you pathetic bandwagon "Art" lovers, lets see how far your bullshit studies take you.
Erm......ok. If I ... ( 3 weeks ago by ilyushenko)
Erm......ok. If I ever give up my job as a TV producer. Maybe I'll do that. Three points: 1. You refer to Haneke as "art" - He's as easy to watch as they come. 2. It's spelt "boring", not "boaring". 3. I'll have a big fucking mac and fries please.
Furthermore....you ... ( 3 weeks ago by ilyushenko)
Furthermore....you spelt "metaphors" incorrectly too in your previous post. Fucking pleb.
Great movie. It's ... ( 1 week ago by guccy1979)
Great movie. It's like he's taking the movie language to a different level. Building the tension, leaving long shots to long but not to long, playing with viewer perception. Looking 71 fragments you can see totally different film, but it's like he is really getting what's the point of the specific time or place.



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code