Creation Astronomy Propaganda Debunked 02
Uploaded by: AndromedasWake
Video Description:
In this episode, we'll look at a couple of bogus attempts to undermine science related to Lunar and Solar astrophysics.
I apologise for the somewhat erratic sound/volume in this video. I did not record it all in one go, and I have no idea what I'm doing in iMovie. The next one will be better.
To those who were referred to me by DonExodus2, thank you for checking out my videos and I hope you'll like what you see enough to subscribe.
To DonExodus2 himself, thank you very much indeed for your support.
Various multimedia in this video was created by NASA/ESA/JAXA/ESO/Berkley/Exeter
Errata:
1. I apologise, this is just completely wrong. It was thought up until 1965 that Mercury was tidally locked to the Sun, but was proven to have 3:2 spin orbit resonance. That means for every 2 years on Mercury, there are 3 days. One Mercurian year is about 88 Terran days and one Mercurian day about 59 Terran days. I think I was once told that Mercury *was* thought to be tidally locked with the Sun, and confused that to mean it was the current consesus. Again, sorry!
Music in this video:
Sven-g-englar - Sigur Ros
Veridis Quo - Daft Punk
Exodus Honey - Honeycut
Tags for this video: Astronomy Atheism Christianity Cosmology Crap Creation Debunked Evolution God Islam Propaganda Reason Religion Science VenomFangX
Find more videos in the "Tech" category
See more videos uploaded by AndromedasWake
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:














To be able to state that and not notice anything wrong with your point of view really shows that you aren't thinking for yourself and that you have been brainwashed. Sad but true. Hopefully you'll accept that in the future.
George Carlin was a genious. :-)
However, I would urge anyone who is watching to realise that Science and Christianity are, though separate, not incompatible.
After all, the 'Big Bang' theory was first proposed by Fr. Georges Lemaitre, a Catholic Priest and member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences.
My only real criticism: It is a shame that an otherwise informative video had to be contaminated with unnecessary 'ad hominem' fallacies.
The worst harm that it does is that it builds the faith of uneducated people on dubious science, such that upon learning the truth, instead of seeing the beauty and complexity of God's creation, they see that their 'faith' has been built, not on solid rock, but on sand.
If we find ourselves at odds with science, as has happened throughout history, and continues to happen even today (Creationism etc.) then, assuming the science to be rigorous, we need to examine whether we have adequately understood the implications of the science.
Does accepting evolution truly discard Salvation History? I hope not - I have.
hating creationism has led me to learn so much about the universe!