Mark Levin: Media Matters is "A Criminal Enterprise"!
Uploaded by: johnnydollar01
Video Description:
On his radio program Friday night, constitutional attorney Mark Levin went nuclear on Media Matters and explained why it is a criminal operation. Plus he got in a few licks at Joe Scarborough, Keith Olbermann, and more. marklevinshow.com
Tags for this video: Bill Edwards Joe John Keith Levin Limbaugh Mark Matters Media Morning MoveOn O'Reilly Olbermann Rush Scarborough
Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by johnnydollar01
| Michael Savage Blasts Sean Vanity and Mark Levin | Mark Levin cuts John McCain down to size | Mark Levin on Keith Olbermann - Part XV |
 |  |  |
| Matt Drudge on Phony Soldiers, Limbaugh, and Keith Olbermann! | Mark Levin on Hillary Rotten Clinton | Mark Levin Tells it like it is about Bob Grant/Al Sharpton |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
And you fail yet again, Leo.
Get a dictionary, will ya?
Do you need knock-knock jokes explained as well...?
The question was: Can you show me a single Media Matters article that edits or changes conservatives' words? That's the point of Media Matters: They present all quotations in their *entire*, unedited context.
This is why conservatives hate them. Anything that simply reveals the inarguable facts of the matter is "liberal". It's the same reason the Church complains that science is inherently "liberal".
As they say, you just got owned. Big time.
Go over to FrontPageMag. com, use their search engine and type in "Media Matters: Hillarys Lap Dogs", and read. Try not to let your liberal bias prevent you from reading it.
Remember, use the dictionary in case you're having trouble ;).
Now, shall we go back to the original question, which you have avoided five or six times now? The simple question is: Can you or anyone else show me a single Media Matters posting that "edits" or "distorts" the conservative speeches and writing that it exhibits?
All they do is post conservative commentary in its full context, with no editing. Please prove otherwise.
It doesn't mean everything they put out is incorrect. In fact, most of it is technically correct...but deliberately misleading. Statistics parsed to present a particular point of view, quotes taken out of context, etc. I'm sure there are Right wing entities doing the same thing.
BTW, your comment that people who aren't white are evil is bullshit. And you know it.
Just look at it once before you make your opinion.
"Nonprofit progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media".
It's all one-way by their own admission. They present a one-sided view that's biased and exaggerated.
BTW, love the "progressive". "Liberal" is such a loathed and discredited label they now use "progressive". lol. Not ONE think progressive about them.
How can the act of showing the *entirely unedited* transcript of a conservative broadcast constitute a "biased" treatment of that transcript?
If I simply repeat what you say -- entirely, and without editing -- how am I being "unfair" to you?
This is what conservatives can never answer.
What I can dispute is an example I found on MM after browsing for 30 senconds. Check out the article titled Dobbs falsely claimed 40%of workers dont pay taxes.
In an attempt to bolster the legitimacy of Obamas promise to cut taxes for 95% of working Americans, MM is trying to discredit Dobbs. The Reps/Dobbs contention is Obamas plan is a fig leaf for expanded welfare
MMs position (same as Obamas, surprise, surprise) is that because people paying zero income tax DO pay social security, excise tax, gas tax, etc. that Obamas tax cut is not a form of welfare. BS! An income tax refund, which you get after filing your taxes in April, is a refund of a portion of the income tax
Thus, my contention that MM is not an honest broker trying to present the full story. Theyre partisan hacks using twisted logic to rationalize Dems positions.
Again, it doesn't mean everything they say is incorrect or misleading. The best way to lie is to surround the "big" lie with minor truths.
MM, IMO, is a Left wing hack machine.
As Chris Matthews said, "let's just admit it; the Dems raise taxes".
And, if the top 5% pay 60% of all income taxes, where does it stop? The answer is, it doesn't stop until ALL income has been redistributed to the point where the Walmart greeter makes the same as the attorney.
We can see who's right just by looking out the window, at reality. The reality is that no industrialized nation has a greater gap between rich and poor than the US. For decades, wealth has been flowing from the middle class to the wealthy. 85% of all U.S. wealth is owned by 20% of the population.
I utterly reject this line of thinking, as I reject the "income disparity" argument. As long as those at the bottom have the basics I don't care if we have a large income gap.
But, you're right about Rep spending. Tax cuts don't help GDP growth nearly as much as if we cut govt spending. I say downsize the govt by 1/4 through vertical cuts, entitlement reform, and reduced military spending.
And if you accept the fact of the unprecedented and unparalleled income gap in this country (among developed nations), then you admit there isn't any kind of "income redistribution" in the US, unless you mean the bleeding of the middle class for the wealthy.
The wealth the country creates, which allows for new jobs, is created mostly by the labor that actually does the producing. Like all Republicans, you're confusing the act of shifting paper around (e.g., paper mortgage securities) with real products and real services.